Field Education System (FES) Model

Situation:

• No appropriate school program is available and families are scattered geographically.

• Families want children to have some opportunities to interact academically with peers.

• A facility is available for an ERC and classroom.

Commitment:

• Families agree to study at least one area of common curriculum, usually developed by the ERC teacher.

• Families agree to schedule a few times during the year when all will gather for classroom interaction based on the common curriculum area.

• Families are responsible to supervise their own children’s curriculum most of the time.

Program:

• Families may choose their own curriculum in all except the agreed-upon common area(s) of study, or may choose to share curriculum in all areas.

• Program works best with a teacher (trained in FES approach) assigned to supervise and plan children’s interactive times. However, committed and trained parents could also handle it.

• If teachers are available, they can consult and adapt individual programs and may also itinerant to families (if level of staffing is adequate.)

Advantages:

• The program is specifically designed to meet the needs of families where parents teach their own children in an isolated setting.

• It fosters interaction across age levels, between siblings as well as classmates, and encourages meaningful communication between parents and children through the study tasks.

• Though it may take more parental time than a workbook approach to education, the time spent is of the kind that builds healthy parent-child relationships, rather than putting the parent in the role of taskmaster.

• Curriculum recommendations are adaptable to families of different cultures and nationalities and to those who are isolated from cultural peers. It is very adaptable to individual children’s abilities and interest.

• Academic interaction with peers is given high importance. Interaction provides academic stimulation and motivation and gives children opportunities to present what they have learned and to learn from each other.

• A strong group identity tends to develop.

• It combines the advantages of keeping children with parents with the advantages of some classroom experience. The amount of time spent in each setting is up to the group to decide.

• Teachers are available for consultation and village visits (if staffing level and travel situations allow) as well as for adapting the program to fit individual situations.

• The ERC resources provide much more than each family could provide on their own.

• Times together build a sense of community and mutual support for families who are isolated most of the time.

• Some families report better productivity because they set short-term goals for village time, take advantage of the FES time to reevaluate, and return to the task with new energy.

Disadvantages:

• Families must come out of their allocation to a more central area more often than they might otherwise. (However, see last point above.)

• Schedules must be coordinated so all participating families can meet at the same time. Housing may be a challenge as well.

• It takes more parental involvement than a fill-in-the-blanks workbook approach to education.

• Just any teacher is not effective in this type of program. In addition to being a good teacher, one must:

  • be flexible, creative, adaptable, and tactful.

  • have inner strength and excellent relating skills.

  • be able to live in all kinds of circumstances.

  • be sensitive and supportive to families of many nationalities and cultural backgrounds.

Permission to copy, but not for commercial use.